As the president of the American Society of Civil Engineers, I have a responsibility to inform the public about any future federal spending.

The current wall posters are, to me, a clear example of wasteful spending.

We’re supposed to spend billions on the wall, and it’s clear that it’s not working.

This is not a time for politics, and we should not spend money on a wall that doesn’t need to be built.

In 2017, the federal government spent $2.2 billion on a 2,000-mile wall along the U.S.-Mexico border.

The wall is expensive, but it will help secure our border, which will help to make the United States a more secure and prosperous nation.

It’s also good for business.

According to the Department of Homeland Security, border crossings fell 6 percent in fiscal 2018, and apprehensions rose 1.2 percent.

The Department of Transportation said in March that there are 5,400 more people crossing the border than there were at the end of fiscal 2015.

This has a lot to do with the economy, which has been growing at its fastest rate in a decade.

The numbers also reflect a drop in illegal crossings, which fell 10 percent in the first three months of fiscal 2018.

If we can’t secure our borders, our economy can’t grow.

And it can’t be growth that creates jobs.

So, the best way to secure our country is to build a wall.

I’ve been trying to do that.

The idea of spending $2 billion for a wall is an overreaction.

We shouldn’t waste money on something that isn’t needed.

But we should try to spend it on something the public wants.

When President Trump first floated the idea of a wall on the campaign trail, it was met with mixed reviews.

The vast majority of Americans opposed it, and the American Civil Liberties Union warned that building a wall would be a violation of the First Amendment.

But then, as he campaigned for president, Trump started to soften his stance, and his rhetoric began to change.

As of July 2018, his campaign said he wanted to “immediately begin construction of a physical wall along our southern border,” and that his administration would not seek to build “a large barrier, fence or other structure.”

Now, it seems like he’s changed his mind.

Last month, President Trump said he was “open to negotiation with Mexico on the cost and timing of a border wall,” and he has not said that the wall should be a political football.

In his first presidential interview with NBC News, he said, “I’m not the one that’s gonna pay for it, you know?

I’m not going to pay for the wall.”

But I am the one who’s gonna fund it.

So let’s keep the money, right?

In my opinion, the only way to keep the wall is to spend the money that the president and the Congress have already appropriated.

And the time to start building a physical barrier has passed.

According the Pew Research Center, Trump has proposed a $3.6 billion border wall in his first budget proposal, and Trump has asked Congress to spend $3 billion on the project by the end, which is three times more than what Congress has allocated.

The Wall Street Journal reported last week that the Department Of Homeland Security is “actively considering building a 2.2-mile concrete wall along parts of the border.”

The Wall Streets Journal also reported that President Trump is now “rethinking the use of the term ‘physical barrier’ in his budget, instead focusing on ‘border wall.'”

But even if Trump gets that $3-billion wall, it’s hard to justify spending money that will be lost in the construction of another barrier.

I would prefer to see a wall of concrete that’s made from recycled material, so we don’t have to build another one.

This wall should cost nothing, but this one cost $2-billion.

It would also be a huge help to border security, as it would prevent illegal crossings from happening and would make us safer.

But it won’t be built unless we pay for what we’re spending on the border wall.

Trump wants to spend money.

He’s trying to spend that money.

But I don’t think he understands the true costs of a project like a wall, or how that money will be spent.

The first barrier is expensive.

And if we spend that $2,000,000 for a $1,000 wall, we’re going to waste billions.

The second barrier is costly.

It will be a long and difficult process.

And in the meantime, illegal crossings will increase.

The third barrier is not costly.

If it’s built, it will save lives.

And, if it’s paid for, it’ll be a good investment for the American economy.

But spending $1 billion for this wall will be the wrong approach.

We need to pay attention to the cost of building a border barrier and start building it now.

And we need